Expansion of Production Researchdevelopment of

[sadiksojib35]

In my opinion, this is a very balanced view of the role of AI in jurisprudence. Indeed, there is a category of cases where a lawyer has to do a large amount of purely mechanical work that could well be paraguay telegram number database transferred to AI: for example, bankruptcy disputes or writ proceedings.

At the same time, other cases, where it is necessary to take into account a broader “human” context, are not yet within the capabilities of AI. On the topic: To help lawyers: how the LegalTech market is developing and what is hindering it The Potential and Limitations of AI in Arbitration In my opinion, today AI can already be trusted with some of the simplest tasks of arbitration proceedings.

Here is what AI could handle now: pre-trial preparation and collection of evidence, requesting documents and evidence from the parties, analyzing large volumes of simple external data, selecting judicial practice and decisions on similar disputes, writing template texts in a given format, preparing standard court documents and analyzing court decisions for compliance with legislation and judicial practice.