They all share some front points, such as

[sumonasumonakha.tu1]

According to the report, TikTok approved 90% of ads that contained blatantly false or misleading information. Meanwhile, Facebook approved a “significant number,” according to the report, though noticeably less than TikTok. In contrast, Meta, in its official information about midterm elections, has reinforced its commitments to prevent voting interference and sharing reliable information. Also, a spokesperson from Facebook declared the test was “based on a very small sample of ads, and is not representative given the number of political ads we review daily across the world.


” Something similar is happening in Brazil. The same NGO, Global Witness, has japan phone number data discovered how YouTube and Facebook are allowing false information during the second round of the presidential election of 2022. What has been done to stop fake news? The leaders from the big social media didn’t stay quiet. The spokesperson from Facebook also adds: “our ads review process has several layers of analysis and detection, both before and after an ad goes live” to answer against the claim of Witness Global. On the other hand, we can see how they have made statements and guidelines for both the midterms in the United States and the presidential elections in Brazil.


Investing in specialized teams; Identify potential threats in real-time; Working with independent fact-checkers; Advocating for transparency It seems that Meta and TikTok are somehow conscious of this issue. And they appreciate the feedback given from different NGOs. Nonetheless, fake news on digital platforms is still a new phenomenon, and it’s going to take more time for us to see relevant changes. How to battle fake news during political events? Political campaigns are complicated, and we must admit that some parties play it dirty.