Relative Political Offenses
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:18 am
Our complete refresh of all discrimination guides is almost complete with the following advice now published:
preventing sexual harassment
sexual orientation discrimination
marriage and civil partnership discrimination
Collective disputes is the only area bucking the trend, with phone number list the number of cases received remaining steady, providing more predictability compared to the last 2 years of high unrest. We have several settlements with a range of public sector trade unions on pay deals and the de-escalation of some long-running disputes.
In the U.K., there is no statutory or generally accepted judicial definition of relative political offense. Nevertheless, broadly defined, a relative political offense is one that requires a nexus between the offense and the political motivation behind its perpetration. Three distinct tests have emerged: (i) the French “objective” test; (ii) the Swiss “proportionality” or “predominance” test; and (iii) the Anglo-American “incidence” test. The early French test considered an offense non-extraditable only if it directly injured the rights of the State and the motives of the accused had been considered irrelevant. The test essentially protected only pure political offenses. On the contrary, the Swiss test examines the political motivation of the offender and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime and applies one of two standards: the proportionality between the means and the political ends or the predominance of the political elements over the common crime elements.
preventing sexual harassment
sexual orientation discrimination
marriage and civil partnership discrimination
Collective disputes is the only area bucking the trend, with phone number list the number of cases received remaining steady, providing more predictability compared to the last 2 years of high unrest. We have several settlements with a range of public sector trade unions on pay deals and the de-escalation of some long-running disputes.
In the U.K., there is no statutory or generally accepted judicial definition of relative political offense. Nevertheless, broadly defined, a relative political offense is one that requires a nexus between the offense and the political motivation behind its perpetration. Three distinct tests have emerged: (i) the French “objective” test; (ii) the Swiss “proportionality” or “predominance” test; and (iii) the Anglo-American “incidence” test. The early French test considered an offense non-extraditable only if it directly injured the rights of the State and the motives of the accused had been considered irrelevant. The test essentially protected only pure political offenses. On the contrary, the Swiss test examines the political motivation of the offender and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime and applies one of two standards: the proportionality between the means and the political ends or the predominance of the political elements over the common crime elements.